How to write a performance review

The latest HR research shows that forward-thinking companies are moving away from top-down, annual performance reviews.

An annual job review just isn’t enough to give employees meaningful feedback. Moreover, organizations like Microsoft, Adobe, and Deloitte found that traditional performance ranking processes often led to bias — and that tying raises and dismissals to performance conversations shifted the focus away from development. (1)

This thinking is echoed by teams. According to a recent Leapsome study, a full one-third of employees are not satisfied with their company’s review process, especially if they only get an annual job review. Team members are asking for more regular, more effective ways of reviewing performance — and modern, people-first organizations need to listen. (2)

So how can we enable our leaders to run more flexible, frequent evaluation processes — and write performance reviews for employees based on their individual strengths, goals, and needs?

This guide will cover exactly what a great evaluation looks like — and give you clear steps on how to build a performance review process that gives teams the feedback they need to thrive. You can use it as a primer for your own review processes, or share it with managers and teams who need guidance and structure to write performance appraisals. 

1. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2023

2. Leapsome Workforce Trends Report, 2023

💪 Performance reviews can be rewarding when done right

Leapsome empowers you to deliver meaningful, effective reviews that develop your talent and boost feelings of belonging.

👉 Learn more

What is a performance review?

An employee performance review — also known as a performance evaluation or appraisal — is a structured assessment, in which managers provide feedback to individual employees on their work and contributions over a certain time period. 

During performance reviews, managers generally: 

  • Evaluate employee strengths and areas of growth, often tied to a competency framework
  • Share actionable steps for improvement
  • Ensure alignment with company goals
  • Communicate role, project, and team expectations
  • Celebrate efforts and achievements 

It’s important to understand the range of evaluation types — annual vs quarterly performance reviews will cover different things, and formal assessments take a very different approach to informal feedback. 

Here are the main differences.

What is an annual review?

These are your traditional, formal yearly reviews at work. They assess employee performance over the full year and often determine promotions, compensation changes, and development plans.

What is a quarterly performance review?

These let managers give more timely input on performance at the end of each three-month period. They’re opportunities to recognize hard work, improvements, and development over the quarter, and a chance for early course-correcting if employees are off track.

What is an informal performance review vs a formal performance review?

An informal performance review is a discussion between an employee and their manager that doesn’t follow a strict performance review structure. In an informal review, the manager will discuss with the employee how they are doing in their role, provide general feedback, and maybe even set goals — but it is not a comprehensive evaluation of performance over a set period.

In contrast, a formal review is a structured, pre-scheduled meeting where the manager documents and evaluates the employee’s performance over a set period, often using pre-set criteria and key performance indicators (KPIs).

However, the difference between formal and informal reviews isn’t always clear cut. More and more companies are looking to make even structured review processes more flexible, informal, and continuous. Recent research on performance management trends shows that IBM now runs simpler, more frequent reviews, while Netflix eliminated bureaucratic, paperwork-led performance evaluations and introduced people-centered appraisals.

Regular performance check-ins can make development and improvement conversations flow naturally, all year round.

Why performance feedback is important 

When run effectively, modern performance reviews:

  • Help employees reach their potential through learning and development
  • Improve employee engagement
  • Promote company culture
  • Identify and resolve issues early on
  • Set clear, achievable goals employees can get excited about
  • Show employees that managers are invested in their development
  • Encourage open, honest communication between managers and direct reports

The purpose of performance reviews is shifting away from a focus on pre-defined rankings and compensation decisions. Now, the overarching goal is to open up dialogues that center on understanding employee experiences to support growth and development. That’s why it’s important for managers to provide well-rounded feedback on performance, including reinforcing as well as constructive comments. 

Companies need to see reviews as a key part of their overarching employee engagement model that contributes to employee satisfaction and well-being. 

Here’s how Claude Silver, leading Chief People Officer/Chief Heart Officer at VaynerMedia, sees it:  

“We are in the middle of a revolution where we talk about such things as top-line growth, KPIs, and performance reviews in the same breath as psychological safety, mental/emotional health, wellness programs and so much more.

Let’s remember we are all motivated by similar things — growth, time, feeling safe, money, autonomy, achievement…”

What does an effective performance review look like?

The revolution can’t come soon enough. Performance reviews still have a poor reputation among managers, employees, and people ops leaders. According to Gallup, only 14% of employees strongly agree that their appraisals motivate them to improve. Most complaints boil down to managers writing reviews without empathy or consideration for their report’s job description. In fact, only about 29% of employees feel the feedback they receive in reviews is accurate and fair. 

Textio language research found that women and BIPOC individuals are even more likely to receive low-quality and unactionable feedback than their white male counterparts. 

Best practice employee reviews require empathy as well as a genuine desire to help employees grow and develop in their careers. Reviews shouldn’t focus on punishing lower-performing employees and rewarding high-achievers. The best performance review process is one that meets every team member where they’re at and provides growth-centered individual goals and feedback.

A well-designed performance appraisal form helps with employee retention, motivation, and morale. 

Good reviews:

  • Use clear, concise, and empathetic language
  • Take the employee’s feelings and personality into consideration  
  • Focus on past and future performance
  • Include feedback opportunities for both the manager and the employee
  • Invite peers and other managers to take part in the process for well-rounded perspectives
  • Align with overall company values
🚀 Deliver performance reviews that support employee engagement 

Leapsome’s review tools let you celebrate your people and invest in their development.

👉 Learn more
Orange checkmark icon.

Wann Sie dieses Playbook verwenden sollten

When to use this playbook

This playbook aims to help managers write productive employee reviews that are transparent, fair, and growth-focused. People ops/HR professionals can also use this playbook to guide their people (especially first-time managers) on delivering great feedback via performance reviews.

Orange checkmark icon.

Was Sie für dieses Playbook benötigen

What you’ll need for this playbook

A system of mutual growth and development

A culture that supports growth and development shows employees how feedback can help them improve. Companies that support employee growth will take time to understand their people’s career goals and provide development and training resources to help them achieve those goals.

A transparent and fair environment 

A transparent environment helps employees trust that performance reviews will be used for their development, and not for punishment. It encourages reports to engage in the review process.

Hints & tips

Hinweise & Tipps
  • Consider implementing the practice of radical candor within your organization. This approach empowers employees and managers alike by encouraging them to balance empathy and clarity when giving constructive feedback in the workplace.
Illustration of two people carrying a box over stairs, another two stacking blocks mid-air, and another two working on a board with boxes and scales, transparent background

Frequently asked questions

Are employee performance reviews confidential?

Employees should have a right to the confidentiality of their employee reviews. Results should be kept between the manager and the report; however, managers may want to discuss it with people ops/HR or their own manager if they have concerns. This may be necessary, but should be done respectfully.

What questions should I ask in an employee review?

What are the main mistakes with employee performance reviews?

  • Rating quantity over quality because quantity is easier to measure (this is called expediency bias);
  • Not having a firm objective in place before reviewing employees;
  • Not giving actionable feedback;
  • Focusing only on weaknesses;
  • Overwhelming the reviewee with too much information.

How often should employees get a performance review?

Besides running biannual 360° performance reviews for all employees, we recommend that you support new hires with structured feedback during their probation period (e.g., at 2 and 5 months for a 6-month probation period).

Should employee reviews be anonymous?

Performance appraisal feedback can be anonymous, but allowing for non-anonymous feedback gives people the chance to follow up.

Who should write an employee review?

Having only one respondent can lead to poor judgment. For a more accurate measure of employee performance, we recommend a holistic approach where peers, managers, and customers/partners review the same person. Some companies don’t include external contributors.

Take Leapsome for a spin

Learn how Leapsome can automate, connect, and simplify your HR processes.

Image of a woman in a circleBook your demoImage of a man in a circleImage of a woman in a circle

Explore other playbooks

Erkunden Sie weitere Playbooks

Run smooth operations with our easy-to-follow how-tos and best practices for all things People Ops

Mit unseren leicht verständlichen Anleitungen und Best Practices für People Ops sorgen Sie für reibungslose Abläufe.

No items found.